Looking Beyond KiX: Other DAO Trends in Sports (Past & Present).

• A new football-trading platform called KiX—framed as a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO)—has emerged, offering users the ability to trade “Digital Athlete Tokens (DATs),” NFTs tied to players’ on-field performances. KiX encourages users to “hold the hottest players, earn rewards when they perform, sell your footballer tokens…” (The Times).

• The platform is drawing scrutiny because Adam Cole, co-founder of the controversial Football Index (which collapsed in 2021, costing users about £90 million), is involved as an investor and adviser. The similarity to Football Index’s speculative model—now rebranded under DAO and crypto terminology—has raised widespread concern. (The Times).

• KiX claims it’s a completely new platform, with a different model and structure, and emphasizes its DAO identity to distinguish itself. Critics, however, remain skeptical, given the emotional and financial damage caused by its predecessor. (The Times).

---

Why This Matters

This case highlights several crucial points in the ongoing conversation about DAOs in sports:

• Regulatory Gaps: KiX operates in a largely unregulated space—the DAO branding doesn’t guarantee protection for users.

• Branding vs. Substance: The “DAO” label can obscure underlying models that may replicate prior failures.

• Consumer Risk: History warns that speculative platforms, especially those tied to volatile digital assets, present real dangers to unwary participants.

---

Though not all recent, here are well-known examples where DAOs have attempted to reshape fan engagement and ownership:

• CO92 DAO: Launched by Kiat Lim (son of Valencia CF owner) with support from Manchester United legends (e.g. Gary Neville), this football DAO aims to democratize sports investment via token ownership. (Forbes, Cointelegraph, Onside Law).

• WAGMI United (Crawley Town FC), SailGP DAO, CortDAO, and BuyTheBroncos DAO: Early explorations in fan ownership through DAOs—ranging from club acquisition ambitions to yacht racing democratization. Legal and governance challenges remain major hurdles. (Onside Law, AISTS).

• FIFA's EVM-Compatible Blockchain: On a different but related front, FIFA is transitioning its NFT platform to an Ethereum-compatible blockchain, signaling growing institutional interests in Web3 sports engagement—not necessarily a DAO, but part of the broader blockchain ecosystem in football. (SingularityDAO News).

---

Summary Table: DAO in Football—Recent vs. Established

Initiative	Nature & Highlights
KiX	Live controversy; DAO-branded NFT trading; Adam Cole involvement revives old fears
CO92 DAO	Conceptual fan-investment model backed by high-profile figures in football
Other DAOs	Experimental models like WAGMI United, SailGP DAO, etc.; still facing legal hurdles
FIFA Blockchain Move	Institutional push into Web3 via NFTs; not a DAO but signals digital engagement shift

---

Final Thoughts

KiX’s emergence raises a provocative question: Does DAO branding truly signal innovation—or can it merely repackage old speculative models in a shinier wrapper? As DAOs continue to infiltrate the sports world, the need for transparency, robust governance, and regulation becomes ever more urgent.

Would you like to dive deeper into:

• How CO92 DAO is structured?

• Legal risks in existing sports DAO models?

• FIFA’s blockchain strategy and what it means for fans and the industry?

Let me know which direction you'd like to explore next!